An NHS guide for patient management during the coronavirus pandemic notes that ‘People with a learning disability have higher rates of morbidity and mortality than the general population and die prematurely’ (see link below). In 2018-19, apparently, at least 41% of deaths of people with a learning disability were from respiratory conditions. Among those with a learning disability there is a higher prevalence of asthma, diabetes and weight conditions (obese or underweight) which make this group ‘more vulnerable to coronavirus’. The guide notes there is therefore ‘strong reason to suspect that people with a learning disability may be significantly impacted by the coronavirus pandemic’. It also cites evidence that people with autism have higher rates of health problems which ‘may result in elevated risk of early mortality’. Although Dylan doesn’t have the underlying conditions which increase vulnerability to coronavirus, his autism and learning disability mean it’s impossible not to worry.
Coronavirus and Capacity
Dylan’s combination of autism and intellectual disability (which I’ll refer to as AutID from this point) means he requires 1:1 support in a residential setting. This puts him at increased risk of infection because he has contact with a large number of support workers (and, by association, their families) which increases his potential exposure to the virus. As we have seen in relation to the elder population, the social ‘bubble’ of a locked-down care home is large and intimate enough for the virus to spread quickly once it has been introduced.
Fortunately, all is well at Dylan’s setting; no one has contracted the virus and the staff are all well and still at work. It is not inevitable, of course, that if a resident or staff member catches the virus they will spread it to others in their care bubble. There are processes (such as testing and using appropriate Personal Protective Equipment) that are designed to prevent this from happening. There’s been a lot of discussion in the media about the shortage of tests and PPE but there are places where supplies are getting through as they should which, happily, is the case at Dylan’s care home.
Even so, it is challenging to provide care for someone with AutID during a pandemic. Those who care for Dylan have to keep him safe while protecting themselves and others. This isn’t easy, even with PPE and full access to tests, because of Dylan’s lack of understanding of social distancing and his inability to protect himself or show consideration for others. Added to this, some people with AutID won’t accept the preventative care and monitoring that are so important during a pandemic.
How do you protect someone with AutID?
It’s all very well having an adequate supply of PPE but adults with AutID may not accept these. This will vary for individuals but Dylan will not tolerate wearing a mask or other people using them. The NHS guidance referred to earlier acknowledges this and advises clinicians that ‘masks and protective clothing may frighten [people with AutID], make them more anxious and lead to adverse behaviours, such as hurting other people, hurting themselves and destroying property.’ This is a pretty accurate description of Dylan’s likely response to an insistence on wearing face masks and it’s good to see such information being issued to front line staff. While I don’t think Dylan will ever accept a covering over his own mouth and nose, I’ve found he will accept me wearing a scarf over mine. This is a simple adjustment, enabling me to do what I can to protect Dylan.
Fortunately, Dylan is quite used to people wearing aprons as this is part of the routine he follows for his social enterprise activity. I’ve also recently managed to persuade Dylan to wear protective gloves when we are out in the community. The first time I wore some I offered a pair to Dylan. He wasn’t interested and pushed them away. I kept mine on and put the spare pair in the side pocket of my backpack. To my surprise, within half an hour of our walk Dylan pulled the gloves out of my pack and put them on. This is the first time I’m aware of Dylan copying behaviour I’m modelling which feels like a real breakthrough. It doesn’t take Dylan long to adapt to something once he’s taken the plunge: the next time we went walking Dylan expertly showed me how to blow into a glove before putting it on.
Monitoring Dylan is a little more challenging. Staff are taking the temperature of residents on a daily basis but Dylan won’t allow this. The only way I managed to get a temperature reading from Dylan as a child was with a Headscan thermometer. There are none to be found at the moment but I keep looking. Taking a temperature reading could be important for monitoring Dylan’s health as he has limited strategies for communicating how he feels.
As the NHS guidance notes, some people with learning disability may be unable to explain how they feel or ‘not be able to articulate their response to pain in the expected way’. Dylan’s communication is limited but he does say ‘oo’ or ‘poor Dylan’ if he is in pain or feels unwell. Sometimes the words he chooses can mislead, however; Dylan uses ‘sick’ to communicate that he is hungry for example. It took me a while to figure this one out but it makes perfect sense – a not very nice feeling in his tummy – and reminds me that Dylan is creative about communication and will substitute a word he knows for one he doesn’t. The NHS guidance includes links to useful resources such as the Non-Communicating Adult Pain Checklist and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, which I’ve been using with Dylan at weekends to encourage him to show me how he feels.
The NHS guidance warns that the presentation of coronavirus among people with a learning disability ‘may be different from that for people without a learning disability’. In some cases, the guidance notes, frontline staff will need to understand behavioural responses to pain such as laughing, self-harm or becoming withdrawn. It’s good to see these examples in the guidance and to read the advice to clinicians to listen to the family or carer as ‘They know the person who is unwell best.’
How do you treat someone with AutID?
The NHS guidance is aimed at front line staff treating people with AutID for coronavirus infection in a hospital setting. While it is reassuring that specialised guidance has been provided about the needs of this very vulnerable group of people, the prospect of Dylan requiring hospital treatment for Covid-19 fills me with dread.
I heard recently that someone with AutID may be accompanied to hospital by one other person (a parent or carer). I found this reassuring as previously it had been unclear and the cause of much concern. Anyone caring for a child or adult with AutID would probably agree that the idea of them being alone in a hospital doesn’t bear thinking about. ‘You cannot let that happen, mum’, my daughter told me. ‘Promise me you won’t let that happen’. I have had to think through some difficult (almost unimaginable) scenarios as the parent of a vulnerable adult. Sometimes there is a flash of intuition which causes me to try to extract promises from others. I telephoned Dylan’s care home manager. ‘Please’, I said ‘Please promise me you will not let Dylan go to hospital alone if he becomes ill.’
For Dylan, and I suspect for many adults with AutID, hospital-based testing and treatment (from pain relief through to ventilation) would necessitate restraint, sedation and inconceivable distress. This is such a difficult possibility to consider, the only way of coping is to focus on keeping Dylan safe at home. Recently, listening to the latest bulletin about testing for coronavirus in care homes, I realised this was not necessarily a good thing, from Dylan’s perspective. The antibody test for coronavirus is a blood test and the test for COVID-19 a nose swab. Both procedures would cause Dylan enormous distress and require restraint and sedation. I telephoned Dylan’s care home manager. ‘I don’t want Dylan to be tested’, I said, ‘Please tell me he won’t be tested’.
Fortunately, everyone involved in Dylan’s care knows him well enough to agree about such things. There is no plan to test Dylan for coronavirus as long as he is symptom-free or managing his symptoms. If he becomes ill, we have a quarantine plan that would allow Dylan to continue to follow his routine as much as possible with minimum disruption. I find it very reassuring to have conversations about such things and to have these plans in place.
Dylan’s Rainbow
For Dylan, support is everything at this time. His contact with me continues as normal, thanks to the guidelines which allow people to provide care for the vulnerable. Dylan’s relationship with support workers is also continuing as usual, due to good management and health practices in the home. Perhaps Dylan notices subtle differences in the way we interact with him. He has a range of games and rituals which involve physical contact, for example. I’ve noticed some members of staff pull back or move Dylan on (understandably) and sometimes I think I see a puzzled look in Dylan’s eyes.
One day, while out for a walk with Dylan, I pulled back myself. Half way around our planned route, we were taking a break. Suddenly, Dylan pushed his water bottle against my mouth. I flinched, pushed it away. I couldn’t believe it. What had been the point of my scarf and careful distance? If Dylan was carrying the virus, he had now certainly passed it to me. Then I saw Dylan’s face, looking dejected. Any other day I would have been celebrating his generous gesture. I had forgotten my water bottle that day and Dylan was simply trying to share what he had with me. Overwhelmed by a bittersweet mix of sadness and joy, I praised Dylan for this suddenly (confusingly) unwelcome social act.
Perhaps one of the hardest things to consider is something happening to me. Statistically I’m far more vulnerable to the virus than Dylan. The section in the NHS guidance about the importance of listening to parents/carers ends with a warning to ‘remember the carer they come in with may not be their usual carer at this unusual time’. I read the sentence twice, turning the various scenarios over in my head. I telephoned the manager of Dylan’s home: ‘if I become ill and can’t look after Dylan…’ I began. Next, I telephoned my daughter: ‘If anything happens to me…’ I began. ‘Oh mum’, she said, ‘don’t’. But it is reassuring to have such conversations; now, more than ever, we need to build circles of support around our family members.
Dylan has been helping to make a rainbow of thanks for everyone who supports him at the care home. It’s been great to see such support for the NHS and care sector in recent weeks; the rainbows and clapping have certainly captured the public imagination . This grim crisis has shone a light on care workers, in particular, and helped to build more understanding and respect for their role. Those who work in or use the care sector have complained about low pay and poor conditions for a long time. Surely supporting the most vulnerable members of society – the elderly and disabled – should be work that is most valued by society, not unacknowledged and underpaid? Maybe the crock of gold at the end of the rainbow is that coronavirus will help us re-evaluate our priorities, as a society?
Where does it End?
It’s a nice idea isn’t it? I would like to believe this might be how the story ends. While I don’t doubt there is strong public support for the health and care sectors, it would be easy to doubt the political will. In particular, some of the provisions of the Coronavirus Bill, which slipped quickly through Parliament at the start of the pandemic with minimum discussion or scrutiny – and which passed into law as the Coronavirus Act on 25th March 2020 – are a cause for concern.
The Coronavirus Act suspends the duties of Local Authorities (under the Care Act 2014) to meet the eligible needs of disabled people and their carers (Sections 18 and 20). Under the Act, Local Authorities only have to provide care if not to do so would breach the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). As access to care and support is not a human right under the ECHR, this opens the door for Local Authorities to withdraw health and social care funding from disabled adults. Other provisions in the Act allow for a delay in carrying out assessments for eligibility for NHS continuing care. How could I not be made anxious by the introduction of this legislation, given that Dylan depends on such funding?
You might say it’s cynical of me to suggest that the Coronavirus Act could pave the way for the removal of health and social care funding from adults with autism and intellectual disability. However, spending priorities will need to be reorganised, given the scale of the economic collapse, and it’s not inconceivable that removing the obligation on Local Authorities to provide health and social care will be part of the recovery plan. If, after all the rainbows and the clapping, we look to the most vulnerable in society to pick up the bill, that won’t be a crock of gold but an empty promise.
Key Document:
NHS. Mental health, learning disabilities and autism: Guidance. Coronavirus, COVID-19 (25 March 2020, Updated 9 April, 2020)