Day 26: Tabs

tabs 003I had another non sequitur in class today. I don’t know why they unnerve me but they do: the student who asks where the water fountain is during a discussion of Bakhtin; the request for information about the library in the middle of an explanation of epistemology; a question about Easter while I am orchestrating perspectives on girls and schooling.

Does anyone know what ‘non sequitur’ means? I had asked a different class earlier this week. Silence. If I tell them, I wondered, will they stop making them? I mentioned it to a colleague over lunch; had she noticed anything similar with her students? Oh yes, she said. Absolutely. It’s because they’ve got all their tabs open. Digi-kids who have grown up with online environments, she suggested, are used to having multiple sites open on their devices; quite comfortable switching between tasks and contexts, they instinctively multi-track, juggling a number of things simultaneously.

I found the suggestion fascinating; what I thought of as a non sequitur may be a student with multiple tabs open, shifting focus to meet multiple information needs?Β  I, by contrast, rarely have more than one open at a time. My daughter laughs at the way I manage my digital life; you do know that you don’t have to shut that down, mum? You can just open another page you know. Do you want me to show you? But I don’t want to be shown; the idea of a lurking open portal unnerves me. I want to focus on one thing at a time. And because my single tab digital life is mirrored by a tendency to single track talk, I am prepared to accept a verbal non sequitur might be a reflection of a student’s digital life. This, I told myself, was an age thing.

Later, however, I realised my colleague’s observation was probably based on experience; plenty of people of my generation, after all, are quite happy ‘toddling’. Today, responding patiently to a student’s open tab, I wondered whether such a habit might change the part of our brain which manages thought and language. Or perhaps, I thought to myself, it could only affect neural processing if engaged in from an early age, while the brain is at its most plastic? And then (as I usually do when considering things neurological or linguistic) I thought of Dylan.

Dylan doesn’t have any interest in online environments but if I were to use the tab metaphor to describe his approach to life I would say that, like me, he has only one tab open. In fact a single tab is a pretty good way of thinking about him; Dylan can be dogged in his pursuit of a subject or activity, returning again and again to it no matter how many alternatives I offer. This is a quality which is often evaluated negatively and labelled as a fixation or obsession. It is equally possible, however, to see this as a strength; the metaphor of a single tab suggests a more positive image of Dylan as single-minded and determined.

Something I always loved about living with Dylan was the quirky view of the world he offered if I made the time for it. When he went into care, one of the things that made me sad was the thought that there would be no more opportunities to learn from or about Dylan. If I wasn’t walking in his shoes anymore, how could I see the world through his eyes? Today, thinking about tabs, I realised Dylan will always be my lens; that the world is Dylan-shaped, even without him.

4 thoughts on “Day 26: Tabs

  1. I would be unneverved, if I were still teaching. I am easily unnerved and though I don’t close my tabs, I don’t hop back and forwards between them, in fact I am usually surprised to see them when I unglue myself from my screen. I don’t think it is multi tasking, I think it is a symptom of what is sometimes called ‘the age of distraction’ and it has pervaded my mind. I am ashamed of this addiction to content, random content, maybe the Dadaists would have approved? Tonight I have looked at a video for making pastry apple roses, which way round a bucket might be used for a scarecrow’s head, a random half hour looking to see if I could find online prices for some furniture I bought for Tim about five years ago, and then come to the clean eloquence of your writing and found myself again. I think I will set my alarm to go off again every 15 minutes that I am here. It is good to make time for others’ views, and try and see through their eyes, increases empathy, understanding, reminds one that one’s take on reality and truth are illusory/partial/biased and so on. The student’s water cooler query is all about them and nothing about the relationship with you and maybe that is why it is so baffling. Like people walking across roads immersed in their little handheld screens and getting run over, they lose touch with their here and now.


    • Oh but Joanna the list of things you have done tonight is absolutely charming – it is a poem! Pastry apple roses? A scarecrow’s head? Tim’s furniture? What an enchanting list. And this is the wonderful randomness of things (oh that sounds like the Louis McNeice poem about things being various and spitting the pips). So in a way I suppose I am envious of my students’ access to a million things – and it cuts both ways because when we need to multi-track they will come rushing with answers to my random questions. Yes, the Dadaists would have loved it πŸ™‚ And perhaps it was a little unfair of me to cite first week examples from first years – it is all new and strange to them and I’m sure the snow and roses will settle as semester runs on. That pedestrian will still be there, however, crossing the road in front of my car, staring at a screen πŸ™‚ I love your observations, x


  2. When I worked as a support teacher, there were several phrases that were used such as ‘single channel attention’ to assess and, I think, often undermine children with language and communication disorders. I remember thinking quite clearly that single channel attention must surely be a strength and lead to depth of knowledge. I guess one person’s strength is another persons weakness.


    • Ah that is interesting. Yes, ‘single channel attention’ sounds negative and I can imagine it applied that way. I am definitely thinking of it differently today – my tab analogy is helping me to claim single channel as a positive. I’ve been thinking about some of the extraordinary feats of engineering and invention which have required utter ‘single channel attention’ to achieve. It might be something we associate with learning and communication ‘disorders’ such as Dylan has, but it is also a necessary component of genius πŸ™‚ As you say, one person’s strength πŸ™‚


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.